WEKO3
アイテム
A Comparison of Four Types of Toothbrushes and Different Tooth Brushing Methods on Plaque Removal II. Examinations using first year dental hygiene students as subjects
https://mdu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1264
https://mdu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1264dd9c217e-b171-4f0f-b5c0-207297f5dd0c
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | Journal Article(1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2012-05-24 | |||||||
タイトル | ||||||||
タイトル | A Comparison of Four Types of Toothbrushes and Different Tooth Brushing Methods on Plaque Removal II. Examinations using first year dental hygiene students as subjects | |||||||
言語 | en | |||||||
言語 | ||||||||
言語 | eng | |||||||
キーワード | ||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
主題 | brushing method | |||||||
キーワード | ||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
主題 | tooth brush | |||||||
キーワード | ||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
主題 | plaque removal | |||||||
キーワード | ||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
主題 | periodontal disease | |||||||
キーワード | ||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
主題 | oral hygiene | |||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||
著者 |
OTA, NORIO
× OTA, NORIO
|
|||||||
抄録 | ||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
内容記述 | In a continuation of the first report, the authors hoped to clarify the relationship between toothbrush specifications and various brushing methods. For this purpose, we compared the effectiveness of plaque removal for 4 different types of brushes with 4 different brushing methods. The first year students of Matsumoto Dental College, School of Dental Hygiene, were selected as subjects. The results were as follows: 1. Brushing methods: No significant difference was observed with the roll, Bass, or modified Stillman methods when all surfaces were grouped together. Also, no significant difference was observed on the facial surfaces with the different methods. However, the Bass and roll methods tended to be slightly better. The results of this study did not correlate with the previous study or with the reports from Arai and Watanabe. The subjects' skill and control at the time of evaluation were taken into consideration. 2. Test brushed: Test brush S was the most effective when all surfaces were grouped together and test brush M was the least effective. This tendency was observed on both the facial and the proximo facial surfaces. 3. Interaction between test brushes and the amount of plaque prior to testing: It was observed that subjects who were divided into the "small" group prior to testing kept the amount of plaque at the same low level after testing. By comparing the results with the previous report, the authors concluded that there was more advancement in the skill of the second year students than the first year students. | |||||||
書誌情報 |
松本歯学 巻 13, 号 1, p. 41-49, 発行日 1987-04-30 |
|||||||
出版者 | ||||||||
出版者 | 松本歯科大学学会 | |||||||
ISSN | ||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||
収録物識別子 | 0385-1613 | |||||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||
収録物識別子 | AN00232590 | |||||||
フォーマット | ||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |