ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 松本歯学(Print edition:ISSN 0385-1613 Online edition:ISSN 2188-7233)
  2. 23巻(1997)
  3. 3号

歯と人工歯の大きさの比較1.上顎前歯

https://mdu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/759
https://mdu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/759
773bf50c-6765-4618-9c12-a284af4aa48c
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
matsumoto_shigaku_23-03-03.pdf matsumoto_shigaku_23-03-03.pdf (1.2 MB)
Item type Journal Article(1)
公開日 2012-05-24
タイトル
タイトル 歯と人工歯の大きさの比較1.上顎前歯
言語
言語 jpn
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 上顎前歯
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 人工歯
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 大きさ
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ journal article
その他(別言語等)のタイトル
その他のタイトル Comparison of Size in the Permanent Teeth and Artificial Teeth 1. Upper anterior teeth
著者 舟津, 聡

× 舟津, 聡

舟津, 聡
恩田, 千爾
坂口, 賢司
谷内, 秀寿
宮川, 崇

抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Twenty-five of each of extracted maxillary right central incisors, lateral incisors and canines exhibiting little incisal wear were obtained from Japanese subjects. In these, and artificial maxillary anterior teeth (Real Crown by Shofu Inc. and Duradent by G-C Dental Industrial corp.), length of crown, breadth of crown and breadth of cervix were measured, and length-breadth index of crown and breadth of crown-breadth of cervix index were calculated. The measurments for the natural teeth were compared with those of the artificial teeth. 1. Compared to the natural teeth, the artificial teeth had smaller mean length of crown for all three basic types (Square, Tapering and Ovoid types). Length of crown for the T type of central incisor and all types of lateral incisor from Company A were larger than the natural teeth, but the central incisor, lateral incisor and the canine from Company B were smaller for all types. 2. Compared to the natural teeth, the artificial teeth had a smaller mean crown breadth for all three basic types. The lateral incisors were particularly small at approximately 85 to 95% of the size of the natural lateral incisor. 3. Compared to the natural teeth, the S and O types from Company A had a larger breadth of neck than the natural teeth. The other types had a smaller breadth of neck than the natural teeth. Compared to the natural central incisor, the breadth of the neck of artificial teeth from Company A were 108.3% for S type, 89.1% for T type and 105.2% for O type, whereas those from Company B were 93.2% for S type, 86.4% for T type and 91.0% for O type. Breadth of neck of the artificial lateral incisors was 92.1% to 107.2% for Company A products, and 88.6% to 89.7% for Company B. Breadth of neck of the artificial canine teeth was 91.7 to 98.3% for Company A, and 85.7 to 92.4% for Company B. Of the artificial teeth from both companies, T type were the smallest, O type were intermediate, and S type were the largest. 4. The breadth of crown-breadth of cervix indes of artificial and natural teeth uese compared. The artificial T type lateral incisors and T type canines were smaller, but the other types were larger. Among the tree basic types, T type were the smallest and S type were the largest.
書誌情報 松本歯学

巻 23, 号 3, p. 161-171, 発行日 1997-12-31
出版者
出版者 松本歯科大学学会
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0385-1613
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00232590
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-19 08:30:34.391360
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3